Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699068›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026

Health economic simulation modeling of an AI-enabled clinical decision support system for coronary revascularization.

Tom Mullie, Arjun Puri, Emma Bogner, Bryan Har, Colm J Murphy, Robert C Welsh, Benjamin Tyrrell, Christopher L F Sun, Joon Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tom MullieAcute Care Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Arjun PuriData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Emma BognerData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Bryan HarDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Colm J MurphyGolden State Heart and Vascular, Burlingame, CA, US.
Robert C WelshMazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Benjamin TyrrellRoyal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Christopher L F SunTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Joon LeeData Intelligence for Health Lab, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. joon.lee@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

Alberta Innovates 212200473CIHR PJT 178027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While artificial intelligence (AI) models have been developed to support coronary revascularization decision-making, health economic evaluation of such models has been rare. We conducted a retrospective health economic simulation modeling study using real-world data from 25,942 adult patients with obstructive coronary artery disease in Alberta, Canada to evaluate the economic value of an AI-enabled coronary revascularization decision support system. Clinicians deciding among medical therapy only, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting were simulated to be provided with AI predictions of 3- and 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. At a willingness-to-pay of $50,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY), as many as 72.4% of all actual treatment decisions shifted to a different health economically optimized treatment, resulting in an average cost saving of $22,960 and a QALY gain equivalent to up to $22,439 per patient. Even in a conservative scenario where clinicians' AI adoption was assumed to be limited, 53.2% of the actual decisions shifted, resulting in an average QALY gain equivalent to up to $32,214 per patient. AI can potentially optimize the health system level economic value of treatment decisions in the form of reduced costs stemming from fewer future complications and improved patient outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID41699068
PMCPMC13022373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.