Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699251›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Notch-induced lateral inhibition compared to standard amplification lateral inhibition therapy for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: A randomised controlled trial.

Anne Quemar, Julie Sircoglou, Fabien Paolino, Mathilde Bachelard-Serra, Samuel Benayoun, Eloi Ramilison, Arnaud Deveze

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anne QuemarRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France. docteur.quemar@orange.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8290-3699
Julie SircoglouRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Fabien PaolinoRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Mathilde Bachelard-SerraRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Samuel BenayounCarré Audition, 25 Parc Dromel, 13009, Marseille, France.
Eloi RamilisonRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France.
Arnaud DevezeRamsay Sante, Hôpital Privé Clairval, 317 Boulevard Du Redon, 13009, Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic tonal tinnitus is a distressing condition, frequently associated with hearing loss. Sound therapy delivered via hearing aids using notch-induced lateral inhibition (NILI) algorithms has been proposed as a targeted approach to reduce tinnitus perception.

methodsThis multicentre, randomized, double-blind crossover trial recruited adults with chronic tonal tinnitus and moderate hearing loss. Each participant was randomized to receive two months of auditory stimulation using either NILI or standard amplification (SA), followed by a 2-week wash-out period and crossover to the alternative protocol. The primary outcome was the change in tinnitus-related handicap (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, THI) at two months. Secondary endpoints included patient satisfaction (visual analogue scales for discomfort and intensity), adverse events, time to first symptom improvement and sustained residual effects.

resultsTwenty-six participants were enrolled. Due to a significant treatment carryover effect, primary analyses were limited to the first treatment phase. At two months, SA yielded greater reduction in THI scores compared to NILI (mean change: -11.45 vs. 0.00; p < 0.05). Both treatment arms showed only modest improvements in tinnitus discomfort and intensity. A greater proportion of SA users reported subjective improvement (91.8% vs. 38.5% with NILI). Adverse events were mild across both interventions.

conclusionIn this well-characterized cohort, notched lateral inhibition delivered through hearing aids offered no advantage over standard amplification for reducing tinnitus-related handicap or distress. These findings underscore the importance of individualized management and signal the need for further trials to clarify which patients may benefit from algorithmic innovations in hearing aid-based tinnitus therapy.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationHearing AidsTinnitusAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeAdultsChronicHearing aidsLateral inhibition treatmentRandomised control trialTonal tinnitus

Identifiers

PMID41699251
PMCPMC13152959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.