ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Cancer statistics, 2026: divergent trends and the implementation gap.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of prognostic risk factors and construction of nomograms for elderly patients with stage III-IV endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: a study based on the SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Single-cell multi-omics dissection of RevitalAge Markers uncovers age-dependent immunotherapy resistance and druggable targets in melanoma.Biology direct · 2026Article
- Regional and national burden of six major digestive cancers in Asia, 1990-2023: An analysis of the GBD Study 2023.iScience · 2026Article
- Engineered exosomes deliver structurally optimized toad BAX to reactivate mitochondrial apoptosis in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
41699272What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.