ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Integration of in vitro and in silico approaches enables prediction of drug-induced liver injury.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) to Assist Medicinal Chemistry.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of drug attrition and poses a significant threat to patient safety. However, current preclinical prediction methods, including heuristic screening rules, in vitro assays, machine learning models and animal testing, have serious limitations. Here, we demonstrate that combining in vitro toxicity data (cytotoxicity, mitochondrial toxicity, bile salt export pump (BSEP) inhibition) with pharmacokinetic information enables high DILI predictivity. In a retrospective analysis of 241 drugs, we show that the ratio of their in vivo maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) to their lowest in vitro toxicity strongly correlates with clinical DILI risks, with ROC AUC up to 96%. Then, we show that comparable predictivity (ROC AUC up to 91%) is achievable prospectively when Cmax values are predicted in silico by high-throughput physiologically based kinetic modelling. Dynamic simulations of bile acid perturbations further identify drugs potentially causing DILI specifically through BSEP inhibition, providing additional mechanistic insights. This integrative, mechanistic approach shows enhanced DILI predictivity and interpretability, offering an animal-free alternative for early drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.