ArticleBMC molecular and cell biology2026
Effects of prey quality through the life cycle of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.
Article in BMC molecular and cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGeneralist consumers can eat a variety of foods, but they are not necessarily equally beneficial. Different feeding histories can influence the fitness of genetically similar individuals. Dictyostelium discoideum is a unicellular generalist predator amoeba that eats bacteria. When bacteria are depleted, amoebae enter the social cycle and aggregate to form a fruiting body, in which about a fifth of the amoebae die to form a stalk while the rest form spores at the top of the stalk.
resultsIn this study, we examined the fitness of D. discoideum when grown on three bacterial prey types: poorly palatable wild-type Pseudomonas vindicans, a more palatable mutant of the same species, and the high-quality food bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae. We used these three bacteria to examine how feeding history shapes fitness throughout the life cycle by measuring proliferation of amoebae, then following spores through germination, plaque formation, and plaque expansion. Amoebae grew on unpalatable P. vindicans only when seeded at high density, and even then, proliferated more slowly. When amoebae with different feeding histories were mixed and allowed to form chimeric fruiting bodies, those cells fed on palatable versus unpalatable P. vindicans did not differ significantly in their spore contribution, except when under an additional stress of the translational inhibitor G418, which makes cells that previously fed on unpalatable P. vindicans contribute fewer cells in spores. Oddly, the amoebae that fed on the good food bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae contributed fewer spores when mixed with cells that fed on either of the P. vindicans clones. Surprisingly, though feeding on unpalatable prey was not a hindrance in the social stage, downstream effects were observed. Spores produced on either P. vindicans strain germinated more slowly than those made from amoebae fed on Klebsiella pneumoniae.
conclusionsLow prey quality strongly affects D. discoideum fitness during the vegetative stage but does not generally lower social competitive ability. Nevertheless, it does affect fitness after the social cycle by reducing the hatching rate of spores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.