Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699562›Full record

GuidelineBMC endocrine disorders2026

Exercise for fracture prevention - evidence and consensus-based practice guideline of the osteology umbrella association (DVO).

Wolfgang Kemmler, Daniel Schoene, Matthias Kohl, Friederike Thomasius, Franz Jakob, Katharina Kerschan-Schindl, Uwe Lange, Stefan Peters, Simon von Stengel

Abstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in BMC endocrine disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wolfgang KemmlerInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. wolfgang.kemmler@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-0669
Daniel SchoeneInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Matthias KohlDepartment of Health, Medical and Life Sciences, University of Furtwangen, Schwenningen, Germany.
Friederike ThomasiusOsteology Umbrella Association Germany, Austria, Switzerland (DVO), Essen, Germany.
Franz JakobOsteology Umbrella Association Germany, Austria, Switzerland (DVO), Essen, Germany.
Katharina Kerschan-SchindlDepartment of Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Uwe LangeGerman Society for Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan PetersInstitute of Sport Science, University of the Bundeswehr Munich, Neubiberg, Germany.
Simon von StengelInstitute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise is considered a cornerstone of fracture prevention in people at increased risk of fractures. However the most effective exercise strategy for preventing fractures has yet to be determined. The primary aim of the present evidence- and consensus-based guideline was thus to derive practice recommendations for effective, feasible and safe training programs to prevent fractures in various cohorts. A novelty of our approach was the assignment of dedicated cohorts at risk for fractures to training objectives that prioritized bone strength or/and fall risk or/and fall impact reduction. In summary, bone strength exercise protocols should include periods of high loading magnitude and rate provided by impact loading and dynamic strength/power training. Fall risk should be addressed by an individualized mix of balance, perturbation, functional, stepping and interactive cognitive-motor exercises. Simple and low-risk strategies for safe landing can be advised unreservedly, however more sophisticated strategies derived from martial arts require close and experienced supervision and high safety standards. If the latter strategies are chosen in interventions, they should be reserved for dedicated training periods. Training frequency should be set at least 2 (bone strength) or 3 (fall risk) sessions/week, possibly with a (block) periodized approach with intense periods intermitted by low/regenerative phases, with varying training aims focusing on progression.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsExerciseExercise TherapyFractures, BonePractice Guidelines as TopicConsensusHumansBone mineral densityConsensus statementExerciseFall riskLow-trauma fracturePractice recommendations

Identifiers

PMID41699562
PMCPMC13063585

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.