Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699647›Full record

ReviewMolecular cancer2026

Harnessing PDX and PDX 2.0: the next-generation paradigm for precision oncology and translational breakthroughs.

Chengli Jian, Hao Fu, Wantao Wu, Nan Zhang, Zaoqu Liu, Zhiwei Xia, Peng Luo, Hao Zhang, Quan Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chengli Jian *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Hao Fu *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Wantao Wu *Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Nan ZhangCollege of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Zaoqu LiuInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei XiaDepartment of Neurology, Hunan Aerospace Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China. xiazhiwei2011@gmail.com.
Peng LuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. luopeng@smu.edu.cn.
Hao ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China. zhsw@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Quan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China. chengquan@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation Y-Gilead2024-PT-0070Chongqing Medical Youth Top Talent Program YXQN202558Chongqing Youth Innovation Talent Project CSTB2025YITP-QCRCX0096Jiangxi Provincial Health Technology Project 202510008Key R&D Program of Jiangxi Province 20243BBI91007National Natural Science Foundation of China 82303610National Natural Science Foundation of China 82372943, 82573181National Natural Science Foundation of China 82503442Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality CSTB2025NSCQ-GPX1144Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20252BAC220048Science Foundation of Hunan Aerospace Hospital 2025YJ01Science Foundation of the AMHT Group 2025YK06The science and technology innovation Program of Hunan Province 2023RC3074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer research has achieved remarkable breakthroughs over the past decades with the aid of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. However, the limitations of conventional PDX models in hindering clinical translation have become increasingly apparent. In 2025, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced a funding shift away from exclusive reliance on animal models without justified integration of novel alternative methods (NAMs), human-relevant modeling approaches. Nevertheless, PDX models cannot be fully replaced currently due to the lingering immaturity and uncertainties of NAMs technologies, indicating that a complete non-animal research paradigm will require sustained methodological development. Therefore, developing an innovative, optimized PDX model to navigate this transitional phase remains the holy grail of preclinical cancer research. Herein, we propose PDX 2.0, a novel conceptual framework that advances conventional PDX models via the systematic integration of NAMs and complementary technologies, thereby enabling more efficient and precise cancer research. This review first delineates the core determinants, major applications, and critical limitations of traditional PDX models, then defines the conceptual architecture and distinctive characteristics of PDX 2.0. We further highlight emerging applications of this framework in high-throughput drug screening, biomarker discovery, and adaptive therapeutic evaluation, positioning PDX 2.0 as a critical evolution of PDX-based research to better support clinically actionable precision oncology.

Indexed as

Medical OncologyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineTranslational Research, BiomedicalXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansCancer ResearchNAMsPDXPDX 2.0Precision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41699647
PMCPMC13015159

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.