Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41699724›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2026

Impact of pre-treatment food on praziquantel absorption, metabolism, treatment-associated side effects, and drug efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Farah Hamdan, Poppy H L Lamberton, Lydia Trippler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Farah HamdanDepartment for Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Science Way, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8QQ, UK.
Poppy H L LambertonDepartment for Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Science Way, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8QQ, UK.
Lydia TripplerDepartment for Biodiversity, One Health, and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Science Way, Glasgow, Scotland, G12 8QQ, UK. Lydia.Trippler@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-0844

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator Grant 101045464National Institute of Health (NIH) 1R01AI179771 - 01A1Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung P500PB_222313UK Research and Innovation UKRI EP/X027082/1Wellcome Trust WELLCOTR/WT_PHD_PROGRAMME 218518/Z/19/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPraziquantel is the drug of choice for parasitic diseases such as opisthorchiasis, schistosomiasis, and taeniasis. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and World Health Organization (WHO) advise administering praziquantel with food to increase absorption and decrease side effects. However, there is a scarcity of evidence on the impact of food, and different types of food, on treatment outcomes. This review aims to address this knowledge gap by (i) examining how pre-treatment food intake is reported in humans, and characterising the types of food provided, if any, and (ii) assessing whether the presence and/or type of food impacts four key treatment outcomes in humans: absorption, metabolism, treatment-associated side effects, and drug efficacy.

methodsWe will search the following databases: Embase (via Ovid), MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and African Index Medicus (via Global Index Medicus), and trial registries including clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Additionally, we will perform citation and grey literature searching and will contact researchers to obtain information on ongoing and unpublished relevant research. The search strategy is constructed using two core concepts: (i) praziquantel, and (ii) the outcomes of interest (pharmacokinetics, treatment-associated side effects, and drug efficacy). In Covidence, two review authors will independently screen the retrieved studies based on pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria and extract data using a standardised form. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomised controlled trials and the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomised studies. Data will be synthesised narratively, and random-effects meta-analyses will be conducted to estimate the effect of food on the outcomes of interest, where appropriate. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. DISCUSSION: This review has the potential to enhance treatment outcomes for individuals and communities living in endemic regions for schistosomiasis and other parasitic diseases treated with praziquantel. Our findings will be of direct relevance for WHO guidelines and, therefore, can help improve the design and impact of future targeted treatment and mass drug administration (MDA) programmes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251024296.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsFood-Drug InteractionsPraziquantelHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSchistosomiasisSystematic Reviews as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnthelminticsPraziquantelAbsorptionEfficacyFoodMass drug administrationMetabolismPharmacokineticsPraziquantelPZQSchistosomiasisSide effects

Identifiers

PMID41699724
PMCPMC13011758

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.