Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41700246›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Surgical Site Infection Prevention Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 50 Highly Cited Articles.

Lora H Alquzi, Nawaf M Alharbi, Sami K Alghamdi, Waleed K Alotaibi, Abdullah D Alessimii, Raghad H Algaed, Majed F Alasmi, Nouf K Yunus, Lujain S Alshamrani, Mohammed K Alburghash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lora H AlquziDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Al-Qunfudhah, SAU.
Nawaf M AlharbiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Rayan Colleges, Madinah, SAU.
Sami K AlghamdiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Waleed K AlotaibiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, SAU.
Abdullah D AlessimiiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, EGY.
Raghad H AlgaedDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Jouf University, Sakaka, SAU.
Majed F AlasmiDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nouf K YunusDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, SAU.
Lujain S AlshamraniDepartment of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, SAU.
Mohammed K AlburghashDepartment of General Surgery, King Fahad Specialty Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infections remain a major concern in modern surgical practice, as they are among the most frequent postoperative complications and place a substantial burden on patients and healthcare systems worldwide. Through a bibliometric analysis, this study examined the 50 most highly cited publications addressing surgical site infection prevention, aiming to describe research trends, dominant study designs, involved specialties, and the overall strength of the available evidence. A comprehensive search of the Web of Science Core Collection was performed in March 2025 using predefined terms related to surgical site infection and preventive strategies. Following the screening of 2,728 records, the top 50 most cited articles were selected for analysis. Bibliographic characteristics and study-level variables, including study design, level of evidence, specialty, and reported outcomes, were independently extracted by two reviewers, and descriptive analyses were conducted. The included publications demonstrated a predominance of retrospective cohort studies, with most articles classified as level two evidence. General surgery and orthopedic surgery were the most frequently represented specialties. Research output peaked during the 2010s, a period that included a higher proportion of controlled trials but also underscored the ongoing challenges of conducting large-scale interventional studies. Overall, this analysis highlights substantial scholarly interest in surgical site infection prevention while revealing a continued shortage of randomized studies despite a sustained global attention to this topic.

Indexed as

antibiotic prophylaxisbibliometric analysisperioperative infection controlsurgical site infectionsurgical site infection prevention

Identifiers

PMID41700246
PMCPMC12906919

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.