ArticleCureus2026
Interplay of Lifestyle Social Determinants and Isolation in the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome Among Spanish Workers.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of cardiometabolic abnormalities linked to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. While lifestyle and sociodemographic determinants are well established, the role of social isolation in MetS is less explored.
methodsA nationwide cross-sectional study included 117,298 Spanish workers from multiple occupational sectors (2021-2024). MetS was defined using National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III, International Diabetes Federation (IDF), and Joint Interim Statement (JIS) criteria. Sociodemographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial variables were assessed with standardized questionnaires, including the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument. Logistic regression estimated associations with MetS prevalence.
resultsMetS prevalence was 28.7% (NCEP ATP III), 32.1% (IDF), and 33.5% (JIS). Men had consistently higher prevalence than women (p<0.001). Prevalence rose with age, exceeding 40% in workers ≥55 years. Low socioeconomic status was linked to a higher prevalence (p<0.001). Lifestyle factors were strongly associated: physical inactivity doubled the odds of MetS (OR≈2.0); poor Mediterranean diet adherence and smoking increased risk, while regular activity and high dietary adherence were protective (all p<0.001). Low social support independently increased the odds of MetS across all definitions, even after adjustment.
conclusionsIn this large cohort, MetS was highly prevalent and strongly influenced by lifestyle, sociodemographic, and psychosocial factors. Social isolation emerged as an independent determinant, underscoring the need for workplace strategies integrating lifestyle promotion with social support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.