A clinical roadmap for lateropulsion after stroke based on a realist review strategy.

Suzanne Babyar, Nicholas Sheehan, Jessica Nolan, Taiza G S Edwards, Jeannine Bergmann, Amy Meyer, Michael W O'Dell

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Suzanne BabyarDepartment of Physical Therapy, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3367-3717

Nicholas SheehanDivision of Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3148-5067

Jessica NolanSchool of Allied Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5802-2120

Taiza G S EdwardsDepartment of Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3033-2981

Jeannine BergmannDepartment of Neurology - Research Group, Schoen Clinic Bad Aibling, Bad Aibling, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0414-6106

Amy MeyerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4500-8770

Michael W O'DellDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-2152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo generate a clinical roadmap for managing lateropulsion after supratentorial stroke which integrates theory and practice using a realist review strategy.Data SourcesMedline Complete, CINAHL Complete, PEDro, Academic Search Complete, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and Embase were searched until December 2025.Review MethodsTwo searches included review and non-review articles about people with contralesional lateropulsion after supratentorial stroke. We excluded articles about people with ipsilesional lateropulsion resulting from brainstem or cerebellar stroke and non-English articles. Guided by

Indexed as

Postural BalanceSensation DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansclinical recommendationslateropulsionrealist reviewStroke

Identifiers

PMID41700998

DOI10.1177/02692155261418609

PMCPMC13428074

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.