ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
An online machine learning model for predicting medication adherence in hypertensive patients: data from the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS).
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of stigma on medication adherence among patients with multimorbidity: mediation analysis of medication literacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHypertension, a leading global cause of death with high prevalence and poor control, faces a critical issue of poor medication adherence. Existing predictive models for medication adherence suffer from limitations such as small sample sizes, insufficient inclusion of multiple factors, and a lack of nationally representative longitudinal data on the Chinese population.
aimThis study aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model for predicting medication adherence among Chinese hypertensive patients.
methodUsing data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, we categorized medication adherence as "high" or "low" based on consistency across two survey waves. Predictors included demographics, physical/psychological capability, motivation, and social-environmental factors. After missing data imputation via random forest, feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated, with interpretability provided by Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis. A Shiny-based web application was developed for model visualization and functions.
resultsAmong 2773 hypertensive patients aged ≥ 45 years, 53.2% had low medication adherence. XGBoost performed best (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.828, accuracy = 0.726, F1-score = 0.713) in the test set. SHAP analysis indicated that better adherence was associated with the presence of multiple chronic conditions, overweight or obesity, cardiometabolic multimorbidity, older age, depression, residence in an urban area, sleep duration exceeding 8 h, a lack of bidirectional financial support, and disability in instrumental activities of daily living. In contrast, residence in the western region, smoking, and being employed were associated with non-adherence. The developed online tool provided real-time, personalized risk assessments, with predictions made interpretable via the SHAP framework to quantify key factors' contributions and offer transparent decision support.
conclusionThis study developed an XGBoost machine learning model and online tool to predict medication adherence in Chinese hypertensive patients. The tool provided immediately actionable and transparent risk stratification, enabling targeted intervention. Future research should perform external validation of the model using electronic medical records or objective adherence data, thereby enhancing its generalizability and practical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.