ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Process Evaluation of a Parish-Based Intervention to Reduce Mental Health-Related Stigma.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Latino populations in the United States have high levels of unmet mental health (MH) needs and MH-related stigma. Collaborative, community-based programming with predominately Latino churches is a promising approach for reducing MH stigma and unmet MH need in Latino communities. Project AMEN implemented MH workshops, homilies and text messages with Latino Catholic parishes to test this approach. We examined reach, satisfaction, effectiveness and fidelity for the overall intervention and individual activities. We collected baseline and one-year post-intervention data from n = 579 people at seven parishes in southern California. Variables included participation in and satisfaction with activities, MH stigma, sociodemographic characteristics, faith-related characteristics, MH needs, and fidelity measures for workshops. We used bivariate and multivariate modeling to describe intervention reach, satisfaction and effectiveness and to identify differences across subgroups. We describe fidelity for the MH workshop. Overall, 71% of the sample participated in at least one intervention activity. Participants were on average 48 years old, female, married, had less than high school education, and attended the parish for more than five years; 24% reported MH needs. Reach and satisfaction were greater for married individuals and those with strong connections to the parish. Individuals with MH problems had more barriers to participation. Activities most often participated in were text messages (42%), the introductory MH workshop (20%) and MH homily (20%). We observed high workshop fidelity. The number of AMEN activities predicted reduction in four types of MH stigma. AMEN showed promising results with respect to reach, satisfaction and effectiveness at reducing MH stigmaf.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.