ArticlePloS one2026
Implementation research to scale up the women and infants integrated interventions for growth study (WINGS) in Himachal Pradesh: Protocol for a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal undernutrition, anaemia, low birthweight (LBW) and childhood stunting remain major public health challenges in India. Evidence from the Women and Infants Integrated Growth Study (WINGS) randomised controlled trial in Delhi showed that an integrated package of health, nutrition, psychosocial and water, sanitation and hygiene (WaSH) interventions delivered from preconception through early childhood substantially reduced LBW and stunting. However, national programmes largely emphasise pregnancy and early childhood, with limited attention to preconception care, and there is little evidence on government-led scale-up models. This protocol describes government-led implementation research to scale up WINGS in Himachal Pradesh.
methodsWe will conduct a 36-month mixed-methods study using implementation science principles and a theory-driven process evaluation. Implementation will begin in a learning block, followed by expansion to remaining blocks. The design is anchored in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation → Behaviour). Evaluation will use an Interrupted Time Series (ITS) design. Participants include preconception women, pregnant women, postpartum mothers, children under 24 months, frontline workers (ASHAs, AWWs, ANMs) and facility staff. Interventions span health, nutrition, psychosocial and WaSH domains, integrated within ICDS and National Health Mission platforms. The objective is to develop an optimised model for scale-up that is sustainable, scalable and achieves high-quality population coverage. Outcomes include anaemia, low BMI and inadequate weight gain among women and children, with process indicators assessing compliance. Quantitative data will be analysed using segmented regression in R; qualitative data will undergo framework analysis; and economic evaluation will estimate incremental cost-effectiveness (S4 File: costing forms). DISCUSSION: This implementation research will generate evidence on the feasibility and scalability of integrating preconception-to-early-childhood interventions within government systems to inform national policy. REGISTRATION: CTRI/2023/10/058538 (Registered on 11/10/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.