ArticlePloS one2026
Treatments for COVID-19 and acute respiratory infections are associated with gender and comorbidities in an Italian online survey.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ministries of health need to know and understand factors affecting medical treatment choices of population subgroups, to tailor official recommendations. This study aimed to identify, quantify and compare treatments used by patients with an acute respiratory infection with and without COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic by accounting for important factors potentially affecting treatment outcomes. With an online questionnaire, retrospective information on treatments used during events of acute respiratory infections were gathered in Italy. Logistic regression was used to detect significant associations between treatments and a set of variables including socio-demographic data, comorbidities and risk factors. We explored differences in treatments used by subjects who developed symptoms of an acute respiratory infection, with and without COVID-19. Women generally took more treatments than men for both, common acute respiratory infections and COVID-19, although, for the latter condition the gender difference in the average number of treatments was smaller. Painkillers (incl. NSAIDs) followed by antibiotics were the most frequently used drugs by both disease groups while the use of macrolide antibiotics and steroids were typical for the COVID group. Logistic regression models for COVID-19 treatments showed significant positive associations between women and the use of food supplements, depression severity and the use of ibuprofen, as well as between both, age class 50-64 and cardiovascular pre-conditions with macrolide antibiotics. COVID-19 patients were largely following official recommendations issued by the Italian Ministry of Health, using less complementary and alternative medicines when compared to common acute respiratory infections. Particularly, official recommendations suggesting the use of allegedly anti-inflammatory macrolide antibiotics for COVID-19 seem to have been followed for patients with cardiovascular pre-conditions. Considering that macrolide antibiotics augment the risk for cardiovascular death and that cardiovascular diseases are known to be a risk factor for COVID-19 related death, treating COVID-19 patients with macrolide antibiotics was probably not a great idea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.