Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41701818›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Pichia-CLM: A language model-based codon optimization pipeline for

Harini Narayanan, J Christopher Love

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harini NarayananKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-4885
J Christopher LoveKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-0921-3144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The preference in synonymous codon usage-the so-called codon usage bias (CUB)-is governed by several factors such as the host organism, context and function of the gene, and the position of the codon within the gene itself. We demonstrated that this mapping can be learned from the host's genome using language models and subsequently applied for codon optimization of heterologous proteins expressed by the host. This pipeline called Pichia-Codon language model (Pichia-CLM) was applied to the industrial host organism, Komagataella phaffii. With this approach, production of heterologous proteins was enhanced up to threefold compared to their native sequences. Furthermore, Pichia-CLM consistently yielded constructs with enhanced productivity for proteins of varied complexity, compared to commercially available tools. Finally, we showed that Pichia-CLM generates sequences resembling the properties of codon usage found in the host's intrinsic host cell proteins and learned features such as avoiding negative cis-regulatory and repeat elements based on patterns in the genome data. These results show the potential of language models to unbiasedly learn patterns and design robust sequences for improved protein production.

Indexed as

CodonCodon UsageModels, GeneticSaccharomycetalesCodonbiotechnologycodon usage biasencoder–decoder networksgenetic sequencesrecombinant protein production

Identifiers

PMID41701818
PMCPMC12933070

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.