Evidence mapPaperPMID 41702378Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

ReverseGWAS identifies combined phenotypes associated with a genotype in GWA studies.

Leonid Chindelevitch, Åsa K Hedman, Dmitri Bichko, Daniel Ziemek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leonid ChindelevitchMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6619-6013
Åsa K HedmanInflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Research and Development, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Dmitri BichkoInflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Research and Development, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Daniel ZiemekInflammation and Immunology, Pfizer Research and Development, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationTraditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) aim to uncover the genetic variants associated with a single phenotype of interest (typically a disease), and to elucidate its genotypic architecture. However, many of today's GWAS simultaneously measure multiple related phenotypes, leading to the possibility of pursuing the reverse aim of elucidating the "phenotypic architecture" of a single genetic variant. In other words, we may ask what combination of measured phenotypes is associated with a given genotypic variant. ReverseGWAS is an algorithmic platform for answering such questions in the context of large-scale multi-phenotype GWAS.

resultsWe demonstrate the effectiveness of ReverseGWAS on simulated data, showing its ability to identify logical combinations of phenotypes with a reasonable amount of noise. We then apply it to a selection of combined phenotypes from the UK Biobank, obtaining 719 candidate associations using autoimmune diseases and 205 using common ICD10 codes. We find that the majority of these associations (546/719 and 111/205, respectively) successfully replicate in an independent cohort, FinnGen. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of ReverseGWAS is freely available to non-commercial users as an installable R package at https://github.com/Leonardini/rgwas.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypeSoftwareAlgorithmsGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID41702378
PMCPMC13003317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.