Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41702660›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Enhancing palliative care in intensive care units: protocol of EPIC, a controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase.

Spyros D Mentzelopoulos, Christiane S Hartog, Theresa Tenge, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Sophie K Piper, Michaela Barbier, Katerina Rusinova, Martin Neukirchen, Stephen Schüürhuis, Hanne Irene Jensen and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06605079 (Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06605079 narecruitingnot on this map

Enhancing Palliative Care in ICU

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharite University, Berlin, GermanyRan2024 to 2027Enrolled2,040ConditionsPalliative CareArmsComplex intervention, Routine treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Spyros D MentzelopoulosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Evaggelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1159-8282
Christiane S HartogDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM |CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Theresa TengeInterdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany theresa.tenge@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9529-2461
Matthias SchwenkglenksInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM) and Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-1173
Sophie K PiperInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0147-8992
Michaela BarbierInstitute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM) and Health Economics Facility, Department of Public Health, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Katerina RusinovaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic.
Martin NeukirchenInterdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stephen SchüürhuisInstitute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3124-6056
Hanne Irene JensenDepartments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Vernon van HeerdenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jochen DutzmannDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1406-2221
Dominique DrescherDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany.
Markéta ZvaraDepartment of Palliative Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4948-4119
Victoria MetaxaDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4232-6845
Akiva NachshonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Edoardo De RobertisSection of Anaesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM |CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-0495
Andreas EdelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM |CVK), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9951-7223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients in intensive care units (ICUs) and their families face existential physical, psychosocial and spiritual distress. Integrating palliative care (PC) into ICU care may benefit patients, relatives and ICU clinicians. Prior PC studies have shown a reduction in ICU length of stay (LOS) and distressing symptoms without altering overall mortality. A shorter ICU LOS may alleviate the burden for patients and relatives and help optimise the use of limited intensive care resources. PC in the ICU, however, remains underused, partly due to limited access and knowledge of ICU clinicians. Also, robust data regarding the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of PC treatment in the ICU are scarce. We established the 'enhancing palliative care in ICUs' (EPIC) study to implement a system-based harmonised practice model across European ICUs. The aim is to investigate if early integration of PC via telemedicine, clinician education and bedside tools is effective and cost-effective, ultimately benefiting patients, relatives and ICU clinicians. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, controlled, cluster-randomised, non-blinded stepped-wedge design trial with crossover phase aims to recruit around 2,000 patients from five European countries. All adult patients admitted to participating ICUs-with an ICU LOS exceeding 72 hours, where cancer is not the primary cause of critical illness, and who are not expected to die within the next 24 hours-are screened for the need for specialised PC based on the attending physician's judgement. This judgement is triggered by the presence of one or more of the following: (1) significant disagreement among ICU team members and/or relatives about the appropriateness of current ICU treatment, (2) considerations of limiting life-sustaining therapy or (3) the anticipation that a specialised PC consultation may benefit the patient, their relatives or the ICU team. Patients identified as needing specialised PC and their relatives are then enrolled after obtaining written informed consent.The complex intervention consists of (a) a blended-learning programme to foster knowledge and attitude about PC among ICU clinicians, (b) bedside tools, including a checklist to identify patients in need of PC and a factsheet and (c) standardised telemedical consultations from trained EPIC interventionists. Patient and relative follow-up is conducted 3 months post-ICU discharge. Outcomes include clinical measures (including ICU LOS (primary outcome), severity of critical illness, invasive treatments and health-related quality of life), economic endpoints (resource use, costs, cost-consequence situation, cost-effectiveness), ICU clinician burnout and distress, and patient and family perception about the quality of symptom management, care and communication. Endpoint analyses will employ generalised linear mixed models, accounting for the clustered data structure and stepped wedge design. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: EPIC complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by all local ethics committees. A decision-making structure is established to ensure trial procedures are carried out according to Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and communicated to participants, healthcare professionals and the public. Sets of anonymised study data will be made available following Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06605079.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPalliative CareCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Over StudiesEuropeHumansLength of StayMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)HEALTH ECONOMICSINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CAREPALLIATIVE CAREPerson-Centered CareTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41702660
PMCPMC12918684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.