ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Rapid Motor Inhibition as a Mechanism to Prevent Outdated Movements.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden environmental changes can render planned hand movements suboptimal or even counterproductive. To prevent the execution of outdated motor plans, the motor system may transiently inhibit actions following salient changes, allowing time to evaluate alternatives. While such a mechanism is well established for eye movements, its applicability to hand movements remains unclear. Here, we present findings from three online behavioral experiments and two lab-based replications designed to probe key features of this mechanism in manual responses: reflexive inhibition, temporal precedence, complete movement updating, and sensitivity to saliency. Participants of either sex performed rapid sequential tapping movements toward onscreen targets. At an unpredictable time, either a relevant change (a target displacement) or an irrelevant change (a brief luminance flash) occurred. We measured movement initiation rates following these changes and compared them with a no-change baseline. A significant transient inhibition of movement initiation followed both relevant and irrelevant changes. This inhibition preceded observable updates to the movement plan. At the time of inhibition release, the update to a movement plan was complete. Across experiments, we observed stronger inhibitory effects for more salient changes. The lab-based replication confirmed that the latency of this inhibitory response aligns with visuomotor reaction times. These results support the existence of a general-purpose, rapid inhibitory mechanism in hand movements analogous to inhibition in the oculomotor system. We propose that such inhibition provides a reflexive, domain-general safeguard against obsolete actions following unexpected changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.