ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessing the link among laterality, sex and competitiveness to verify the evolutionarily stable strategy of handedness.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
About 90% of humans are right-handers, and some evolutionary theories explain this asymmetry as an advantage at the population level, with right-handers having advantages in cooperative behaviours and left-handers (particularly males) having advantages in competitive behaviours. To test this hypothesis, in Experiment 1 we collected online self-report questionnaires from more than 1100 respondents, finding that stronger left-handedness was positively related to self-developmental competitive orientation and negatively related to anxiety-driven competition avoidance. Importantly, higher levels of hyper-competitive orientation emerged in left- compared to right-handers. The Laterality Quotient (LQ) was not related to personality traits, but sex differences emerged in neuroticism, depression, anxiety and in all measures of competitiveness. In Experiment 2, a subset of 48 left- and right-handers (half females) were invited to complete a pegboard task: the resulting dexterity index did not correlate with self-report LQ, nor with any of the measures collected in Experiment 1. We conclude that LQ and dexterity are distinct measures of laterality, with LQ (not dexterity) specifically related to competitiveness. These results add evidence supporting evolutionary explanations of population-level lateralization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.