ArticleCommunications biology2026
Hippocampal and cortical oscillatory dynamics support semantic processing and performance.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Facial expression processing is modulated by face gender and anxiety levels in developing youth.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While extensive work has mapped the anatomical regions that support semantic processing in healthy adults, the neural dynamics of such processing remain poorly understood. Herein, we use magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assess semantic-relatedness judgements (i.e., related versus unrelated) in 150 healthy adults. MEG data were transformed into the time-frequency domain and significant task-related oscillatory responses were imaged using a beamformer. Whole-brain, voxel-wise linear mixed-effects (LME) models were used to assess conditional differences while controlling for age. We find that participants respond slower during semantically-unrelated compared to -related trials and have stronger theta oscillations during unrelated trials in bilateral inferior frontal, parietal, and hippocampal areas, with the reverse pattern in the left superior parietal. In the gamma range, participants exhibit stronger gamma oscillations during related trials in prefrontal, hippocampal, and occipital regions. These findings suggest that theta and gamma oscillations may serve distinct roles in semantic processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.