ArticleDysphagia2026
Accuracy of Otolaryngology-performed Simplified Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (S-FEES): A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and modified barium swallow study (MBSS) are considered the gold standard studies for evaluating oropharyngeal swallow. In the United States, these studies are most commonly performed by speech-language pathologists (SLPs), although internationally FEES may be performed by otolaryngologists or other providers Limited literature exists on Otolaryngologist-performed FEES without the presence of SLP in the outpatient setting. This study presents the concept of Otolaryngology simplified screen FEES (S-FEES) and its accuracy compared to SLP-performed MBSS. A retrospective chart review of adult dysphagic patients presenting to an Otolaryngology clinic was performed, identifying patients who underwent Otolaryngology-performed S-FEES and SLP-performed MBSS within 3 months of each other. Demographic information and study findings were compiled and analyzed. Reliability and predictive values were calculated for S-FEES using SLP-performed MBSS as the standard. Overall, 89 patients, 52.8% male, with a mean age of 66.7 years, met the inclusion criteria. Within the group, 57.3% of patients were identified with normal S-FEES, 51.7% with normal laryngoscopy, and 68.5% with normal MBSS. Cohen's kappa for S-FEES and MBSS was 0.762. Otolaryngology performed S-FEES had 100% sensitivity and 85.9% specificity of detecting abnormal swallow when compared to SLP-performed MBSS. Positive and negative predictive values were 73.7% and 100%, respectively. Otolaryngology-performed S-FEES represents a streamlined application of the standard FEES protocol that can be readily incorporated into otolaryngology outpatient practice in the absence of an SLP. This simplified screen protocol demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for identifying patients who may benefit from referral for comprehensive swallowing evaluation by SLP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41703068What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.