ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Selective oestrogen receptor modulators and Alzheimer´s disease: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSelective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are a standard treatment for breast cancer and osteoporosis. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is a serious public health concern. This study aimed to identify potential pharmacovigilance signals related to dementia and AD for SERMs in menopausal and postmenopausal women.
methodsTo investigate this possible association, a disproportionality analysis was performed in VigiBase, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs). Disproportionality was quantified using the reporting odds ratio (ROR).
resultsWe found risk of reporting dementia for tamoxifen [ROR = 1.74 (1.23–2.45)] and raloxifene [ROR = 1.63 (1.05–2.53)] and AD for raloxifene [ROR = 5.12 (3.26–8.05)]. No statistically significant association was detected for fulvestrant and bazedoxifene with dementia or AD. Most of the reports were severe and affected women over the age of 75. The latency of the reactions was predominantly long, suggesting that dementia is a late-onset reaction. The duration of treatment varied from a few months to more than three years, which may indicate that long-term exposure to SERMs is not necessary to develop dementia associated with these drugs.
conclusionSignals of disproportionate reporting have been observed between the incidence of dementia and AD with SERMs. There are conflicting results from the different studies that have been conducted on the relationship between these drugs and AD. More research is needed to find out what factors determine the risk of cognitive impairment associated with SERMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.