Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703158›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Using scene proximity judgments to study food-specific recognition ability.

Conor J R Smithson, Yiming Lin, Isabel Gauthier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Conor J R SmithsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. conor.smithson@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2595-4367
Yiming LinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Isabel GauthierDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Jeffrey L Neul · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NSF BCS Award 2316474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual recognition of food depends on both domain-general and domain-specific visual mechanisms. Food-recognition ability negatively correlates with food neophobia (the tendency to avoid novel foods), possibly because the avoidance of novel food may limit perceptual experience that supports food recognition abilities. In prior work this relationship remained when domain-general object shape recognition ability (o) was controlled for, suggesting that this relationship is specific to food recognition. However, it is possible that other general recognition abilities, such as those for color and texture information, could also play a role. To test this, we developed outdoor scene-recognition tests. Like images of prepared food, outdoor scenes are rich in color and texture information. In 204 participants, we replicated previous findings that food-recognition tasks remain correlated after controlling for o. We additionally found that these correlations remain when scene-recognition ability is controlled for, strengthening evidence for a food-specific visual ability. The negative relationship between food-recognition ability and food neophobia also persisted after controlling for both o and scene-recognition ability, supporting the idea that this relationship reflects food-specific processes. These results indicate that food-specific processing goes beyond general visual abilities that apply to shape, color, and texture. The relationship with food neophobia supports a connection between perceptual expertise for food and affective responses to food that could inform interventions for individuals with restricted eating patterns.

Indexed as

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake DisorderFoodJudgmentPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultFood neophobiaIndividual differencesObject recognitionScene recognition

Identifiers

PMID41703158
PMCPMC12913323

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.