SynthesisAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Optimal and Minimal Doses of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Improve Psychological Distress: A Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Subgroup Analysis of Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal doses of psychotherapy prevent overtreatment and help mental health service managers better allocate resources and tailor treatment to fit individual needs. This meta-analysis originally aimed to evaluate the optimal and minimal doses of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to improve overall psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and stress). PubMed, Scopus, and PsycNET databases were systematically searched to discover eligible studies until October 2024. More manual searches were conducted using Google Scholar. Due to heterogeneity, standard mean differences (Cohen's d) were estimated using the random-effects method. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were used to explore some potential moderators. Analysis of data from 91 studies (6,639 people) from 20 different regions showed that ACT moderately (d = -0.46, p < .001) reduced psychological distress with stable improvements (d = -0.31, p < .001) over time. Meta-regression analysis indicated that the pooled estimates were influenced by seven moderators, including age, gender, control type, population type, geographic region, risk of bias, and study year. Additionally, psychological distress was significantly reduced in 9 of the 17 treatment doses studied, with 8 sessions identified as optimal and 4 sessions as minimal. We conclude that the improvements in the outcome across optimal and minimal doses of ACT are remarkable and relatively stable over time. Evaluating optimal doses of ACT for other psychological outcomes will be the target of future meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41703258What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.