Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703285›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2026

Machine learning-based cfDNA fragmentation profiling using automated capillary electrophoresis for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Sasimol Udomruk, Songphon Sutthitthasakul, Nuttida Bunsermvicha, Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish, Dumnoensun Pruksakorn, Phasit Charoenkwan, Petlada Yongpitakwattana, Kanlaya Khounkaew, Thanapak Jaimalai, Treephum Duangsan and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Sasimol UdomrukCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Songphon SutthitthasakulCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Nuttida BunsermvichaDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kanokwan PinyopornpanishDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Dumnoensun PruksakornCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Phasit CharoenkwanModern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Petlada YongpitakwattanaCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kanlaya KhounkaewCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Thanapak JaimalaiCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-3342-5213
Treephum DuangsanBiomedical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Santhasiri OrrapinCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sutpirat MoonmuangCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pitiporn NoisagulCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-9998
Arnat PasenaCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pathacha SuksakitCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Ratikorn GamngoenCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Pimpisa TeeyakasemCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Chaiyut CharoentumDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Sarawut KongkarnkaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Worakitti LapisatepunDivision of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. worakitti.l@cmu.ac.th.
Parunya ChaiyawatCenter of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine (CMUTEAM), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. parunya.chaiyawat@cmu.ac.th.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a significant clinical challenge due to the limited sensitivity of current surveillance tools, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and ultrasound. Recently, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation analysis has shown promise in cancer detection; however, current sequencing-based approaches remain costly and unsuitable for large-scale screening.

methodsHere, we introduce a predictive model for early HCC detection called "CEliver" (CfDNA-based automated capillary Electrophoresis method for Liver cancer screening), a model leveraging high-dimensional fragmentation profiling from the intensity distribution of cfDNA fragment lengths using automated capillary electrophoresis. We developed CF-2D features, a computational framework that extracts over 300 quantitative features from electropherogram data, including cfDNA concentration, dominant fragment sizes, two-dimensional shape descriptors, and short-to-long fragment ratios. We integrated these features with AFP levels to build the CEliver model, developed in 111 individuals and validated in an independent cohort of 69 subjects.

resultsHere we show the CF-2D profiles differ significantly between HCC patients and high-risk individuals. The CEliver model achieves 98% sensitivity across all HCC cases, and 96% sensitivity with 99% specificity for early-stage HCC (stage 0/A), substantially outperforming AFP (60% overall sensitivity, 35% for early-stage). In external validation, CEliver shows 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity.

conclusionsCEliver provides a practical and accurate strategy for early HCC detection. By enabling high-dimensional cfDNA fragmentomics analysis on a widely accessible electrophoresis platform, it bridges the gap between research-grade cfDNA technologies and real-world clinical implementation. This method represents a simple and scalable approach that could potentially be applied in HCC surveillance.

Identifiers

PMID41703285
PMCPMC13022191

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.