Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41703569›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Community based interventions for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women living in rural, regional and remote areas: a scoping review.

Madison Frith, Mary Rose Angeles, Feby Savira, Sean Randall, Crystal Man Ying Lee, Rachel Huxley, Suzanne Robinson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Madison FrithInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. madison.frith@deakin.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0794-2906
Mary Rose AngelesInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5660-9198
Feby SaviraInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0383-812X
Sean RandallInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-5090
Crystal Man Ying LeeInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6613-5491
Rachel HuxleyFaculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-6616
Suzanne RobinsonInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5703-6475

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among women worldwide, yet prevention has historically centered on male risk profiles. For women living in rural, regional and remote settings, compared with metro settings, cardiovascular risk is higher because of the intersectionality between gender and geographical determinants such as limited access to timely care. Community-based and primary-care interventions show promise in addressing modifiable risk factors, but consolidated, gender-specific evidence for non-metropolitan contexts remains limited.

objectiveThis scoping review synthesises community-based interventions for primary CVD prevention among rural and regional women, mapping current approaches and gaps to inform future practice and policy toward equitable cardiovascular outcomes.

methodsA scoping review was conducted on both quantitative and qualitative publications in Medline Complete, Embase, CINAHL Complete, APA PsychINFO and AMED databases.

conclusionThis review of community-based interventions for primary CVD prevention in rural, regional and remote women found multicomponent programs (education plus coaching, goal-setting and self-monitoring) delivered in-person and in groups were more effective than single-component approaches. However, most interventions were not gender-specific, rarely co-designed, and seldom included gender-based analyses, reflecting persistent gender bias. Future research should embed co-design initiatives with women living in rural, regional and remote communities to address cardiometabolic risks and rural access barriers. Gender-disaggregated outcomes and implementation measures should also be routinely reported.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCommunity Health ServicesPrimary PreventionRural PopulationFemaleHumansCardiovascular diseaseCommunity based interventionsPrimary carePrimary preventionWomen's health

Identifiers

PMID41703569
PMCPMC13015016

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.