ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2026
Neutrophil extracellular traps in rheumatoid arthritis: biomarkers, drivers, and emerging therapeutic targets.
Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophil extracellular traps in osteoporosis: mechanistic links to bone remodeling imbalance and therapeutic perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Multifactorial pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: interaction between inflammation, metabolic dysregulation, and tissue mechanics.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are web-like structures composed of DNA, histones, and granule proteins released by activated neutrophils. While originally characterized as part of the innate immune response, NETs are now recognized as contributors to the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This review summarizes current clinical evidence linking NETs to RA, with a focus on their utility as biomarkers for disease activity and treatment response and their potential mechanistic role in disease progression. Elevated levels of NET components, such as myeloperoxidase-DNA complexes, citrullinated histones, and calprotectin, have been reported in RA and correlate with inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity scores. Treatment with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 inhibitors, reduces NET markers, whereas persistent NET formation is associated with poor response. NETs also promote pathogenic processes, including anti-citrullinated protein antibody formation, Th17 activation, and osteoclastogenesis. Although no therapies currently target NET formation directly, preclinical studies using PAD4 inhibitors and antibodies against citrullinated histones show promising effects. Standardizing NET biomarkers and conducting longitudinal studies will be essential for clinical translation. Overall, NETs represent both a biomarker and a mechanistic driver in RA, offering a novel opportunity for therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.