Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704029›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2026

Nutritional rehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.

Sawsan Abdul-Hamid, Wayne Fradley, Bethan E Phillips

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sawsan Abdul-HamidCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham.
Wayne FradleyCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham.
Bethan E PhillipsCentre of Metabolism, Ageing and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMajor abdominal surgery imposes significant physiological and psychological stress on patients and can lead to associated changes with consequent morbidity. Postoperative rehabilitation aims to minimise the impacts of surgical stress and facilitate convalescence and return to normal function. This review aims to highlight recent research in abdominal surgery rehabilitation with a focus on nutrition and adjuvant exercise and best practice guidelines. RECENT

findingsEmerging interventions for restoration of normal gastrointestinal function postoperatively include the use of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation and probiotics. Oral nutritional supplements in the postoperative period mitigate body weight loss, and routine use is now recommended after colorectal operations. Where oral intake is insufficient, enteral or parenteral nutrition is indicated, with meta-analyses demonstrating potential benefit of early supplementary parenteral nutrition. Immunonutrition postoperatively has been shown to reduce surgical complications and to have benefits over and above standard nutritional therapy. The evidence for adjuvant contractile interventions in the postoperative period is marked by heterogeneity in patient populations and exercise type, and further evidence is required in this space. SUMMARY: The evidence base for postoperative rehabilitation is continually increasing, and recent international guidelines recommend several novel nutritional practices, notably the use of probiotics and immunonutrition.

Indexed as

AbdomenDigestive System Surgical ProceduresNutritional SupportNutrition TherapyPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsHumansImmunonutrition DietMalnutritionProbioticsabdominal surgeryimmunonutritionmalnutritionrehabilitationsurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41704029
PMCPMC13048318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.