ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Scaling law links plant growth variation to grain yield in wheat stands.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growth rate, a fundamental trait associated with plant resource use, scales with plant mass, following consistent allometric power laws shaped by biophysical constraints and natural selection captured in metabolic scaling theory (MST). Although well-established in wild plants, MST has been overlooked in crop improvement. We quantified the relationship between individual plant mass and growth rate in 195 European winter wheat cultivars under glasshouse conditions and examined how variation in growth allometry relates to stand-level grain yield across eight field environments and to its underlying genetic, developmental, and physiological mechanisms. Variation in allometry was linked to plant size, in which increased leaf allocation and faster development elevated allometric exponents. Phenotypic and genetic analyses revealed adaptive strategies, ranging from large, slow-developing genotypes that support reproductive initiation to small, fast-developing genotypes that enhance floret survival and reproductive effort. A shared genetic basis associated with Photoperiod-1 linked growth allometry in the glasshouse to genotype-by-environment interactions for grain yield in the field. Our findings demonstrate that growth allometry is biologically robust and agronomically relevant. While phenology is associated with adaptive variation in allometry, the allometric framework integrates developmental and physiological processes that jointly shape cultivar performance across environments, providing a basis for environment-specific crop improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.