Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704472›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

From genetic risk to early detection - clinical outcomes of a person-centered screening program for women with a high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Ke Zhou, Caroline Abadie, Louise Crivelli, Euriell Fortin, Martine Bellanger, Charlotte Huet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Redefining breast cancer: therapeutic opportunities in HER2-low and emerging molecular subtypes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ke ZhouDepartement of Human and Social Sciences, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France.
Caroline AbadieDepartement of Oncogenetics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France.
Louise CrivelliDepartement of Oncogenetics, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Euriell FortinCoordination of the Phare Grand Ouest, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Martine BellangerDepartement of Human and Social Sciences, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France.
Charlotte HuetCoordination of the Phare Grand Ouest, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is little evidence on breast cancer (BC) diagnosed in women with a high genetic risk, before and after their inclusion in a long-term risk management program based on genetic risk assessment. We analyzed clinical outcomes in women enrolled in the Phare Grand Ouest (PGO) program. Methods: The PGO includes carriers of the Results: Within the matched cohort, those with incident BC were significantly younger at inclusion, but were of comparable age at the time of first diagnosis. They had smaller tumors, and the odds of advanced-stage disease were approximately 30% lower than those observed in women with prevalent BC (OR = 0.29, p < 0.01). Younger age and a triple-negative phenotype were independently associated with larger tumor size. No significant effect was shown from healthcare accessibility indicators. Conclusion: The PGO's coordinated, person-centered approach to high genetic risk management was likely associated with earlier-stage BC detection in women with the

Indexed as

BRCA1BRCA2breast cancerclinical outcomesearly detectiongenetic testinggermline pathogenic variantscreening

Identifiers

PMID41704472
PMCPMC12907759

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.