ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and kidney stone risk in individuals with metabolic dysfunction: evidence from cross-sectional and cohort analyses.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Kidney stones are a common disorder with increasing global prevalence. Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), a systemic metabolic condition, has been suggested to be linked with kidney stones, but existing evidence is inconsistent. This study aimed to clarify the association between MASLD and kidney stones risk using both cross-sectional and cohort analyses. Methods: A total of 1,875 participants from a cross-sectional study and 1,903 from a community-based cohort were analyzed. Logistic regression was used in the cross-sectional study, while incidence rates, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox models estimated risk in the cohort. Subgroup and mediation analyses were performed, with METS-IR, WBC, and eGFR examined as mediators. Results: In the cohort study, there were 94 incident kidney stone cases identified during a median follow-up of 34.62 months, with an incidence rate of 17.6 per 1,000 person-years. In the cross-sectional analysis, MASLD was positively associated with kidney stones, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.466 (95% CI: 1.059-2.028) after adjustment for potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant differences in cumulative incidence between MASLD and non-MASLD groups (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox regression confirmed MASLD as an independent risk factor for kidney stones (HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.29-3.23). Subgroup analyses showed consistent associations in metabolically high-risk individuals. Mediation analyses further highlighted METS-IR as a key mediator linking MASLD to kidney stone formation. Conclusions: MASLD was independently associated with increased kidney stone risk, particularly in metabolically high-risk individuals. METS-IR mediated this relationship, underscoring the critical role of insulin resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.