ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2026
Development and validation of a fentanyl quantification model for drug checking services.
Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal and regional associations between fentanyl concentrations in the unregulated drug supply and drug-related mortality in British Columbia, Canada.The International journal on drug policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug checking services are becoming increasingly popular. Despite the significant variability in fentanyl concentrations observed in the unregulated opioid supply, quantifying fentanyl concentrations using community drug checking technologies remains challenging. This study reports the development of the first machine learning model to classify and quantify multiple fentanyl analogues in community drug checking samples, using data from British Columbia, Canada. Methods: Drug checking samples from harm reduction sites using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy were forwarded for laboratory analysis at Health Canada's Drug Analysis Service. Using gold-standard quantitative nuclear magnetic resonance results, we developed a machine learning pipeline to classify and quantify fentanyl and fluorofentanyl in unregulated drug samples. Results: Over a nearly six-year period, 131,096 drug checks occurred at British Columbia harm reduction sites and 2032 unique drug samples were forwarded for laboratory analysis. A total of 974 training samples were used, each containing varying amounts of fentanyl or fluorofentanyl. Model performance depended on sample composition: ridge regression produced the most accurate fentanyl estimates in absence of fluorofentanyl, while random forest performed better in mixed-analogue samples. A screening model allowed us to combine these into a hybrid pipeline, improving estimates for both fentanyl (mean average error=3.74; R Discussion: Our study shows that machine learning models for fentanyl quantification can be used to augment traditional community drug checking technologies. However, any practical use as a point-of-care tool should be accompanied by clear communication of uncertainty to ensure predictions support, rather than unintentionally undermine, harm reduction goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.