Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704683›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026

In water or on land? A network meta-analysis of aquatic and land-based exercise interventions for pain and disability in chronic lower back pain.

Hao Wu, Penglin Diao, Juan Del Coso, Xiaoyu Liu, Yiwei Min, Ruimeng Ran, Bopeng Qiu, Yinkai Zhang, Ziyu Wang, Carl Petersen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hao Wu *Sports Institute, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, China.
Penglin Diao *School of Sports Training, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Juan Del CosoSport Sciences Research Centre, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
Xiaoyu LiuSchool of Arts and Sciences, Fuyao University of Science and Technology, Fuzhou, China.
Yiwei MinDepartment of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Ruimeng RanCollege of Education, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Bopeng QiuDivision of Sports Science and Physical Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yinkai ZhangChina Wushu School, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Ziyu WangFaculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Carl PetersenFaculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) imposes a substantial healthcare burden. For CLBP, non-pharmacologic pain management within physical therapy/rehabilitation commonly relies on therapeutic exercise (exercise therapy). Aquatic interventions such as exercise and balneotherapy are widely prescribed to treat CLBP, but their comparative effectiveness against land-based exercise, and multi-model programs remain unclear. We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the effects of aquatic, land-based exercise, and multi-modal interventions on pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain. Methods: We searched from inception to May 2025 for randomized controlled trials in adults with chronic non-specific low back pain that evaluated water-based therapies (aquatic exercise, hydrotherapy/balneotherapy). All randomized arms within eligible trials were retained, allowing comparisons with land-based exercise, combined aquatic + land-based programs, and general care/blank control. Results: We included 26 RCTs, forming a 9-node network (blank control, general care, land-based exercise, aquatic exercise, balneotherapy, and their combinations with general care/land-based exercise). For pain intensity, compared with blank control, balneotherapy + general care (SMD = 2.51, 95% CI 1.26-3.76; Conclusion: In CLBP, multimodal programs that integrate hydrotherapeutic components with general care or exercise tended to provide greater improvements than single interventions for both pain and disability. Among single modalities, effects were outcome-specific: for pain, aquatic exercise performed best and land-based exercise generally exceeded balneotherapy; for disability, balneotherapy and aquatic exercise showed larger improvements than land-based exercise. Land-based exercise remains a beneficial and pragmatic option where aquatic access is limited, while adding general care to land-based exercise did not show a consistent additional benefit. This analysis is substantially limited by very high heterogeneity ( Systematic review registration: Registered on PROSPERO. Unique Identifier: CRD42023432018. Public URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023432018.

Indexed as

aquatic exercisebalneotherapychronic low back painhydrotherapyphysical therapyrehabilitationtherapeutic exercise

Identifiers

PMID41704683
PMCPMC12907308

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.