ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Efficacy evaluation and clinical value exploration of secondary inpatient treatment for total deafness-type SSNHL: a single-center prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total deafness-type sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) represents one of the most challenging subtypes of SSNHL due to its poor response to initial therapy and uncertain prognosis. Secondary inpatient treatment has been proposed as a potential salvage strategy; however, its efficacy and predictors of favorable outcomes remain poorly defined. Methods: This study included 120 patients with unilateral total deafness-type SSNHL, divided into secondary treatment and control groups. Hearing thresholds at low, middle, high, and full frequencies, pure-tone average (PTA) at speech frequencies, and speech recognition rate were evaluated across six time points (T1-T6). Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores and improvement rates were also analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of marked hearing recovery. A nomogram was constructed to predict the hearing prognosis of patients with SSNHL. Results: Compared with the control group, the secondary treatment group exhibited significantly earlier onset and greater magnitude of improvements in hearing thresholds and speech recognition rate (all Conclusion: Secondary inpatient treatment offers a significant auditory benefit for patients with total deafness-type SSNHL by accelerating and amplifying recovery. Young age, early intervention, and well-preserved vestibular function are key determinants of a favorable prognosis. The predictive model constructed hereby can effectively predict the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.