Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41704897›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026

Fully automated volumetry of ventricular subregions on computed tomography using object detection and semantic segmentation.

Raffaele Da Mutten, Olivier Zanier, Alessandro Carretta, Giorgio Palandri, Massimo Bottini, Daniel de Wilde, Ulf C Schneider, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E Staartjes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raffaele Da MuttenMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Olivier ZanierMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alessandro CarrettaDepartment of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Italy.
Giorgio PalandriUnit of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Instituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Massimo BottiniMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Daniel de WildeMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ulf C SchneiderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Luca RegliMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carlo SerraMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience and Microsurgical Neuroanatomy (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Our goal was to develop and validate machine learning models that are capable of fully automatic identification and segmentation of frontal, temporal, and posterior horns, the body of the lateral ventricle, the third and fourth ventricle, as well as the atrium on either side. Methods: Patients shunted for hydrocephalus were included. Data from two centers was used for development/external validation, respectively. Manual labelling of ventricular subregions on computed tomography (CT) was performed. First, an object detection algorithm (YOLOv5) was trained. This allowed for precise cropping of the subregions that could then be used as input for a 2D U-Net. For comparison, a nnU-Net was also trained. Precision, recall, mean average precision 50 and 50-95 (mAP50; mAP50-95) were used as performance metrics for the YOLO algorithm. Dice score, Jaccard score, and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance assessed performance for the U-Net. Results: 80 CTs from patients at our center were included, as well as 50 from a second center. The mean age was 68.59 ± 15.89 and 75.94 ± 4.17 for the first and second centers, and 43 (52.5%) and 30 (60%) were male. MAP 50, mAP50-95 was 0.728, 0.453 for internal and 0.274, 0.124 for external validation across all classes. Best mean Dice scores were 0.92 ± 0.1 and 0.90 ± 0.05 for the body of the left lateral ventricle. Conclusions: Automatic segmentation and volumetry of ventricles including their subregions was feasible with high precision on computed tomography, potentially helping the clinical evaluation of even subtle changes in ventricular volume.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial intelligenceDeep learningHydrocephalusMachine learningNeurosurgery

Identifiers

PMID41704897
PMCPMC12907488

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.