ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
Automated segmentation of trunk musculature with a deep CNN trained from sparse annotations in radiation therapy patients with metastatic spine disease: an observational study.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated framework for volumetric musculoskeletal segmentation and assessment of torso CT images in large-scale databases.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Given the high prevalence of vertebral fractures following radiotherapy in patients with metastatic spine disease, torso muscle segmentation is necessary for biomechanical modeling of vertebral loading, permitting individualized evaluation of fracture risk. Methods: In this study, we developed and validated a deep-learning model for full volumetric segmentation of the thoracic and abdominal spinal musculature in cancer patients with metastatic spine disease from sparsely annotated clinical CT image data. We obtained CT data for 148 metastatic spine disease patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment, and an external set of randomly selected 30 subjects from the National Lung Screening Trial. We extracted 1924 axial CT images at the midpoint of each vertebral level (T4 to L4) and manually labeled the key extensor and flexor muscles (up to 8 muscles per side) at each level. We trained a 2D nnU-Net deep-learning (DL) model to segment each muscle and, using these sparse annotations, trained the model to segment each muscle's 3D volume per spine. Two experienced radiologists independently and blindly evaluated the anatomical fidelity of the segmentations using a Likert scale, for 1) manual- and 2) DL-segmentation, 3) random test samples from the muscle's 3D volume and 4) an external NLST CT data. Results: The DL method achieved comparable performance to manual segmentations with a mean Dice score above 0.769. Mann-Whitney test analysis showed that the radiologist ratings of DL-generated muscle segmentations were noninferior to the manual segmentation for each muscle. Discussion: Demonstrating excellent performance for rapid, high-anatomical fidelity 3D segmentation of the main flexor, extensor, and stabilizing thoracolumbar muscles, the DL model from clinical CT scans, this development holds significant potential for reducing the manual effort required to generate individualized musculoskeletal models in cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.