ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2026
Legalization dilemma and solution of China's professional sports league governance.
Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper takes the frequent dissolution of clubs and wage arrears of players in China's professional sports leagues in recent years as a starting point, revealing the deep-seated governance crisis under its prosperous appearance. By combining the progress of Chinese professional sports in terms of policy-driven and legal evolution, the article focuses on analyzing its legalization dilemma in the four core areas of governance structure, property rights system, regulatory system, and player mobility. On this basis, drawing on mature European and American experience and combining with China's national conditions, it puts forward a systematic legal path with "charterization" governance as the core, clarifying the status of legal persons, strengthening the application of law, and constructing a special litigation mechanism to provide theoretical reference for promoting the high-quality development of China's professional sports leagues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.