Evidence mapPaperPMID 41705280Full record

ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026

Glycolysis enzymes and cellular lactylation in tumour.

Chenyuan Dai, Lihua Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Glycolysis enzymes and cellular lactylation in tumour.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenyuan DaiDepartment of Cellular and Genetic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lihua WangDepartment of Cellular and Genetic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5868-3411

Funding

Fudan University JIF101242Y
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular lactylation, a recently identified post-translational modification, has emerged as a crucial regulator in various biological processes, particularly in cancer. The discovery of lactylation provides a new perspective for understanding the functional significance of the Warburg effect in tumour cells. Enzymes involved in the glycolytic pathway modulate lactylation, influencing tumour genesis and progression. This review explores the intricate relationship between glycolysis, lactylation and tumour biology, with a focus on how enzymes participating in glycolysis impact lactylation in cancer cells. We discuss how glycolytic enzymes regulate lactylation and highlight their broader implications in tumour biology. The role of lactylation in shaping the tumour microenvironment underscores its increasing significance as a biomarker for cancer prognosis and a target for therapeutic intervention. Therefore, we also summarised the potential of targeting lactylation as a cancer therapy strategy. KEY POINTS: Glycolytic enzymes regulate lactylation in cancer cells. Lactylation drives tumour growth, metastasis, immune evasion and contributes to microenvironment remodelling Targeting lactylation holds promise for cancer therapy.

Indexed as

GlycolysisNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalTumor Microenvironmentglycolysis enzymeslactylationprotein post‐translational modificationtumour genesis and progression

Identifiers

PMID41705280
PMCPMC12914357

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.