ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
MASLD biomarker discovery: evaluating lipidomics techniques across disease progression.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) spans a spectrum from benign steatosis to aggressive steatohepatitis (MASH) and fibrosis, with lipid dysregulation as a core pathophysiological driver. Lipidomics is pivotal for identifying stage-specific biomarkers, yet the optimal analytical platform remains unresolved due to diverse and rapidly evolving methodological approaches. This review comprehensively compares key lipidomics techniques including targeted and untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization imaging (MALDI-IMS), gas chromatography-MS (GC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for MASLD research applications. We discuss in this study the comparative sensitivity of these technique, their sensitivity in detecting low-abundance pathogenic lipids during critical disease transitions, coverage of lipid classes across disease stages, throughput for clinical screening versus deep mechanistic studies, and compatibility with various sample types (serum, biopsy, organoids). By critically assessing trade-offs in quantification accuracy, standardization, and translational feasibility, we identify technique-specific niches. We ultimately provide a pragmatic framework for platform selection to accelerate the validation of lipidomic biomarkers and advance precision diagnostics for MASLD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41706239What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.