ArticleDiscover oncology2026
Immune cell-related gene signatures for diagnostic and prognostic stratification in thyroid cancer using machine learning analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundsImmune cells play a crucial role in the tumor microenvironment (TME) by regulating the progression of cancer cells. However, the clinical relevance of immune cell infiltration-related mRNA in thyroid cancer (TC) remains uncertain. Current diagnostic methods, such as cytology and imaging, still face limitations in accurately assessing tumor behavior and prognosis, highlighting the need for more reliable molecular indicators.
methodsThree cohorts (TCGA, GSE3678, and GSE33630) were included in the study to construct immune-related signatures for thyroid cancer (TC). The immune cell infiltration levels were quantified using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), followed by consensus clustering to identify immune cell-related molecular subtypes (IRMS). Subsequently, immune-related genes (IRGs) were selected via weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). Based on these IRGs, we established two predictive models: an immune cell-related diagnostic signature (IRDS) was developed using a machine-learning framework with 113 combinations of 12 machine-learning algorithms, while an immune cell-related prognostic signature (IRPS) was constructed via LASSO regression algorithm. Finally, both signatures were systematically evaluated for their predictive performance.
resultsThrough WGCNA analysis, key immune-related gene modules were identified in the TCGA-THCA cohort. From these modules, 28 immune-related genes were selected based on their expression patterns and univariate Cox regression results (p < 0.05), and were subsequently used to construct both an immune-related diagnostic signature (IRDS) and an immune-related prognostic signature (IRPS). The IRDS demonstrated strong diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.958) and robustness across multiple validation cohorts (TCGA, GSE33630, and GSE3678). Similarly, the IRPS accurately predicted prognosis in the TCGA-THCA cohort (5-year AUC = 0.888), with higher IRPS scores associated with poorer survival outcomes (HR = 4.604, P = 2.24e-04). Moreover, the IRPS could serve as an independent prognostic factor, and patients with lower IRPS scores showed potential benefit from immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Finally, a candidate drug target CNR2 was identified for the high IRPS group patients.
conclusionsThe developed IRDS and IRPS show potential for improving thyroid cancer diagnosis and risk stratification. Furthermore, CNR2 represents a promising candidate therapeutic target for patients with high IRPS scores, highlighting a actionable path toward personalized treatment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.