Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41706458›Full record

Trial reportJAMA dermatology2026

Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Phase 3 LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Randomized Clinical Trials.

Thomas B Casale, Sarbjit S Saini, Moshe Ben-Shoshan, Ana M Giménez-Arnau, Jonathan A Bernstein, Koremasa Hayama, Nikhil Amin, Lacey B Robinson, Deborah Bauer, Paula Dakin and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04180488 (Master Protocol of Three Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Studies of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04180488 phase3completednot on this map

Master Protocol of Three Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Studies of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1 Antihistamine Treatment in Patients naïve to Omalizumab and in Patients Who Are Intolerant or Incomplete Responders to Omalizumab

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2019 to 2024Enrolled397ConditionsChronic Spontaneous UrticariaArmsDupilumab SAR231893, Placebo, non sedating H1-antihistamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Remibrutinib as a Therapeutic Option for Solar Urticaria.Photodermatology, photoimmunology & photomedicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas B CasaleDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa.
Sarbjit S SainiDivision of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Moshe Ben-ShoshanDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Dermatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ana M Giménez-ArnauDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jonathan A BernsteinDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and Bernstein Clinical Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Koremasa HayamaDivision of Cutaneous Science, Department of Dermatology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nikhil AminRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
Lacey B RobinsonSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Deborah BauerSanofi, Morristown, New Jersey.
Paula DakinRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
Elizabeth LawsSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Allen RadinRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
Melanie MakhijaSanofi, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is an inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent pruritic hives and/or angioedema. Many patients with CSU remain symptomatic despite standard-of-care, histamine 1-receptor antagonist (H1-AH) treatment. Dupilumab blocks IL-4/IL-13 signaling and is approved in multiple disease states associated with type 2 inflammation. In the phase 3 LIBERTY-CSU CUPID-A trial, dupilumab significantly reduced itch and hives severity in anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE)-naive patients with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. However, a replicate trial (CUPID-C) was required per US Food and Drug Administration registration requirements. Objective: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab vs placebo in anti-IgE-naive patients with CSU uncontrolled by H1-AH. Design, Setting, and Participants: The LIBERTY-CSU CUPID-C (2022-2024) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, 24-week phase 3 trial using the same trial design as CUPID-A (2019-2021). CUPID-A and CUPID-C were performed in 10 countries in Asia, Europe, and North and South America with anti-IgE-naive patients aged 6 to 80 years with CSU uncontrolled with H1-AH. Data were analyzed from August to September 2024. Interventions: Dupilumab or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: In CUPID-C and pooled CUPID-A and -C analyses, change from baseline at week 24 in Itch Severity Score over 7 days (ISS7) or Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7), with the other as a key secondary end point, per regional regulatory requirements. Results: The CUPID-C analysis included 151 participants (mean [SD] age, 44.7 [16.9] years; 106 females [70.2%]), of whom 77 (51%) were taking H1-AH at a dosage higher than recommended, and 90 (59.6%) had a baseline UAS7 of 28 or greater. Significant improvements in ISS7 and UAS7 were observed with dupilumab vs placebo at week 24. Least squares mean (SE) changes were -8.64 (1.41) vs -6.10 (1.40), respectively (difference: -2.54 points [95% CI, -4.65 to -0.43]; P = .02) for ISS7 and -15.86 (2.66) vs -11.21 (2.65), respectively (difference: -4.65 points [95% CI, -8.65 to -0.65]; P = .02) for UAS7. CUPID-A and -C combined data (289 participants) demonstrated greater improvements in UAS7 and ISS7. Safety outcomes were generally consistent with the known dupilumab safety profile; 77 patients (53.5%) taking dupilumab vs 81 patients (55.9%) taking placebo reported treatment-emergent adverse events in the pooled analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: The CUPID-C randomized clinical trial confirmed CUPID-A findings, and pooled data demonstrated dupilumab significantly reduced urticaria activity by reducing itch and hives severity in anti-IgE-naive patients with CSU who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1-AH. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04180488.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic UrticariaAdolescentAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPruritusSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabHistamine H1 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID41706458
PMCPMC12917742

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.