Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41707662›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2026

vNOTES retroperitoneal uterosacropexy using the semitendinosus tendon.

Klapdor Rüdiger, Bryan Sarah, Dittmann Julian, Lewitz Dorothea, Hornemann Amadeus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Klapdor RüdigerDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Bryan SarahDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Dittmann JulianDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Lewitz DorotheaDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Hornemann AmadeusDepartment for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Buergerhospital Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this report is to demonstrate the feasibility of combining the harvested semitendinosus tendon technique (HoTT) technique, originally described laparoscopically, with a retroperitoneal vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) approach for central compartment prolapse repair.

methodsA 55-year-old woman with stage III uterine prolapse underwent native tissue sacropexy using an autologous semitendinosus tendon via the retroperitoneal vNOTES approach. Via a pararectal entry, the longitudinal ligament was identified, and the uterus was fixed to the longitudinal ligament of the sacrum using the semitendinosus tendon. The procedure combined native tissue repair with minimally invasive access through the vaginal route.

resultsThe result was an anatomically successful prolapse correction without any intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient recovered well and was discharged after 48 hours.

conclusionIn conclusion, this is the first case to combine vNOTES with the HoTT technique, enabling a minimally invasive, mesh-free, and anatomically precise prolapse repair. vNOTES offers precise dissection and sacral fixation using a vaginal approach. This should lead to fast recovery and reduced postoperative pain. A retroperitoneal approach allows faster operation times and prevents intraperitoneal adhesions. This technique is promising for patients desiring a mesh-free approach. This innovative approach may serve as a promising alternative to conventional techniques in selected patients.

Indexed as

Case reportsHoTTNative tissue repairProlapsevNOTES

Identifiers

PMID41707662
PMCPMC13017168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.