Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41708152›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2026

Menopausal hormone therapy and long term mortality: nationwide, register based cohort study.

Anders Pretzmann Mikkelsen, Thomas Bergholt, Øjvind Lidegaard, Nikolai Madrid Scheller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anders Pretzmann MikkelsenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, 2730 Herlev, Denmark anders.mikkelsen@regionh.dk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7583-9826
Thomas BergholtDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Øjvind LidegaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolai Madrid SchellerDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether menopausal hormone therapy increases the risk of all cause mortality.

designNationwide, registry based cohort study.

settingDenmark.

participantsDanish women born between 1950 and 1977 and alive at 45 years. Follow-up began on each woman's 45th birthday and ended on 31 July 2023. Of 969 424 eligible women, 92 619 were excluded because of thrombophilia, liver disease, arterial thrombosis or venous thrombosis, breast cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, previous use of menopausal hormone therapy, or previous bilateral oophorectomy. Systemic menopausal hormone therapy was the intervention of interest.

main outcome measuresDeath as registered in the Central Persons Register. Secondary outcomes were cause specific mortality registered in the cause of death register (cardiovascular, cancer, or other mortality). Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox regression, adjusted for age, calendar year, parity, educational degree, income group quarter (based on quartiles), country of birth, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, valvular disease, heart failure, and three or more hospital contacts between 44 and 45 years of age.

resultsOf 876 805 women, 104 086 (11.9%) redeemed a prescription for menopausal hormone therapy, and 47 594 (5.4%) died, with a median follow-up time of 14.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 7.9-21.0 years). Women who used menopausal hormone therapy had an incidence rate of 54.9 deaths per 10 000 person years compared to 35.5 per 10 000 person years in the unexposed group, corresponding to an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 0.98). Stratifying this by cumulative duration of menopausal hormone therapy use gave an adjusted hazard ratio after <1 years of menopausal hormone therapy of 1.01 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.05), after 1-2.9 years of use 0.94 (0.89 to 0.98), 3-4.9 years of use 0.90 (0.84 to 0.95), 5-9.9 years of use 0.89 (0.84 to 0.95), and over ≥10 years of use 0.98 (0.90 to 1.07). No unequivocal differences in cause-specific mortality were found between groups. Among the 703 women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy between 45-54 years, those who used menopausal hormone therapy experienced a 27-34% lower mortality hazard as compared to women who did not (median age at death for those who had taken menopausal hormone therapy 60.9 years (IQR 55.3-66.6 years)

conclusionsThis nationwide cohort study did not find menopausal hormone therapy was associated with increased mortality.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesEstrogen Replacement TherapyHormone Replacement TherapyMenopauseNeoplasmsAdultCause of DeathCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID41708152
PMCPMC12915068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.