ArticleScientific reports2026
Developing public health risk messages about antibiotic resistance using metaphors: an international co-design and e-Delphi consensus study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, yet public awareness of its causes and risks remains low, limiting behaviour change. Metaphors—linking abstract ideas to familiar concepts—are promising but underused tools in AMR communication. We conducted the first systematic mixed-methods study to develop novel metaphors addressing key misunderstandings and behaviours. Co-design workshops with the public and doctors in the UK (n = 29) and public in South Africa (n = 22) generated 89 initial metaphors. These were extended through 101 additional suggestions, and evaluated via a 3-round e-Delphi study with 37 AMR communication experts from 27 countries, using the UCLA/RAND appropriateness method. 38 metaphors were endorsed for global use. Invoking domains like nature, tools, and fire fighting, they offer relatable, culturally resonant alternatives to alarmist war and doomsday imagery. This study pioneers participatory methods in behavioural science and provides a blueprint for co-creating health messages, such as tailoring AMR metaphors to specific needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.