SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis.
Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining a target product profile for antimicrobials to treat severe paediatric bacterial enteric infections in low- and medium-income countries, caused byJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Antibiotic Use and Antibiotic Resistance Among Adults in Communities of Montserrado County, Liberia: A Household-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotics are vital for treating infections, but their inappropriate use has driven widespread resistance, now a major global health threat. This systematic review examines antibiotic use patterns in low- and middle-income countries using WHO's prescribing indicator, aiming to guide interventions that promote rational antibiotic use, reduce resistance, and improve public health outcomes. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as Scopus, Embase (Ovid), and Medline (Ovid) for publications from January 2010 to November 2025. Titles and abstracts were initially screened by the first reviewer and discussed with a second reviewer to assess eligibility. Full texts of eligible articles were then independently reviewed by the reviewers, with final inclusion determined through consensus. The methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated using the Kmet Critical Appraisal Checklist. Studies were categorized into 3 groups-public and private sector, public sector only, and private sector only-to examine antibiotic use patterns relative to WHO standards, alongside demographic and institutional data. Electronic searches identified 2912 studies, of which 20 cross-sectional studies were from 11 countries considered eligible for inclusion. Their methodological quality scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. Across all studies, the average "
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.