Evidence mapPaperPMID 41709115Full record

SynthesisInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis.

Anant Nepal, Nilam Bhandari, Ranjeeta Subedi, Delia Hendrie

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anant NepalNepal Karuna Sewa Samaj, Palpa, Lumbini, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-8379
Nilam BhandariPublic Policy Pathshala (Pvt.) Ltd., Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.
Ranjeeta SubediHERD International, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.
Delia HendrieCurtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics are vital for treating infections, but their inappropriate use has driven widespread resistance, now a major global health threat. This systematic review examines antibiotic use patterns in low- and middle-income countries using WHO's prescribing indicator, aiming to guide interventions that promote rational antibiotic use, reduce resistance, and improve public health outcomes. The review followed PRISMA guidelines, searching databases such as Scopus, Embase (Ovid), and Medline (Ovid) for publications from January 2010 to November 2025. Titles and abstracts were initially screened by the first reviewer and discussed with a second reviewer to assess eligibility. Full texts of eligible articles were then independently reviewed by the reviewers, with final inclusion determined through consensus. The methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated using the Kmet Critical Appraisal Checklist. Studies were categorized into 3 groups-public and private sector, public sector only, and private sector only-to examine antibiotic use patterns relative to WHO standards, alongside demographic and institutional data. Electronic searches identified 2912 studies, of which 20 cross-sectional studies were from 11 countries considered eligible for inclusion. Their methodological quality scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.78. Across all studies, the average "

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDeveloping CountriesPractice Patterns, Physicians'HumansPrivate SectorPublic SectorAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticslow- and middle-income countriespublic & privateWHO’s prescribing indicator

Identifiers

PMID41709115
PMCPMC12921170

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.