SynthesisBMC public health2026
Exploring the role of modifiable sex/gender-specific risk and protective factors for anxiety among young people in high income countries: a systematic narrative review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAnxiety is the most common mental health problem in young people and sex/gender differences have been consistently reported, with girls and young women experiencing twice the chance of anxiety compared to boys and young men. There is a limited understanding, however, of the underlying causes of these differences. This systematic review aims to synthesise research identifying modifiable sex/gender-specific risk and protective factors for anxiety among young people aged 16–24 in high income countries.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted on 29th February 2024 and updated on 4th July 2025 across MEDLINE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), Scopus, Sociological abstracts, and Web of Science. Observational studies reporting estimates of sex/gender-specific associations between modifiable risk and protective factors and anxiety according to DSM-5 categories were included. Results were summarised using narrative synthesis.
results85 studies were included. Modifiable factors were grouped into levels: individual; interpersonal relationships; local community; and wider environment and society levels. The review identified conflicting results for sex/gender differences, demonstrating the methodological limitations of the evidence base and the complexity of the modifiable risk and protective factors implicated in the explanations for sex/differences in anxiety among young people aged 16–24 years. Potential sex/gender-specific risk factors emerged; early alcohol use initiation, parental overprotection and social media may be more anxiety-inducing in females than in males.
conclusionsThis review indicates that sex/gender differences may exist in the associations between modifiable risk and protective factors and anxiety. Future longitudinal studies are crucial to understanding how these pathways differ by sex/gender. Studies are needed which explore whether sex/gender influences the relationship between anxiety and gender discrimination, peer relationships, school/college context, the workplace and the school-to-work transition. Such evidence has the potential to guide the development of effective sex/gender-specific mental health interventions. PROSPERO PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD42024518279. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.