ArticleAIDS research and therapy2026
Reason for hospitalization contrasting adjudication versus ICD-10-CM coding among persons with HIV, 2016-2019.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with HIV (PWH) have disproportionately high hospitalization rates, the reasons for which are incompletely understood. Hospitalization reasons based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) discharge codes may lead to misclassification. We evaluated the performance of ICD-based reason for hospitalization with adjudication in PWH.
methodsWe randomly sampled 302 of 1428 hospitalizations (21%) between 2016 and 2019 among PWH in the UNC CFAR Clinical Cohort Study (UCHCC). ICD-based reason was defined as first-listed ICD discharge diagnosis, or second if the principal diagnosis was HIV. We contrasted ICD-based reason and adjudication with four outcomes: complete agreement (same category and diagnosis), partial agreement (same category, different diagnosis), disagreement (different category and diagnosis), and inadequate ICD coding (no single ICD-10-CM code was appropriate).
resultsOverall the 302 hospitalizations occurred among 204 PWH, 69% of whom were male, with median age 51 years (interquartile range [IQR], 40-58), and CD4 count 539 (IQR, 242-789), at time of hospitalization. Adjudication completely agreed with ICD-based reason in 73% hospitalizations, partially agreed in 14%, disagreed in 8%, and ICD codes were inadequate in 6%. Patient characteristics associated with lower proportion of complete or partial agreement were recent CD4 count < 200, nadir CD4 < 50, ≥ 15 discharge diagnoses, length of stay ≥ 4 days, and HIV as a principal diagnosis.
conclusionsOverall ICD codes performed well in capturing reason for hospitalization in most cases. However, adjudications are needed among certain groups of patients, including those with poorly controlled HIV and complex hospitalization course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.