Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709341›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2026

High-throughput screening for tick-borne pathogens in Ixodid ticks collected through crowdsourcing in northern Sweden.

Giulio Grandi, Seungeun Han, Karin Ullman, Ann Albihn, Sara Moutailler, Clémence Galon, Linnea Öborn, Phimphanit Choklikitumnuey, Ann Högberg, Galina Ganchenko and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giulio GrandiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden. giulio.grandi@slu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9620-1792
Seungeun HanDepartment of Epidemiology and Disease Control, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Karin UllmanDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Ann AlbihnDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Sara MoutaillerLaboratoire de Santé Animale, ANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Clémence GalonLaboratoire de Santé Animale, ANSES, INRAE, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, UMR BIPAR, Maisons-Alfort, France.
Linnea ÖbornDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Phimphanit ChoklikitumnueyDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Ann HögbergDepartment of Chemistry, Environment and Feed Hygiene, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Galina GanchenkoDepartment of Chemistry, Environment and Feed Hygiene, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.
Anton de JongDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna OmazicDepartment of Chemistry, Environment and Feed Hygiene, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks are expanding in the northern hemisphere. Along with them, tick-borne pathogens can be introduced into new geographical areas and cause infection and disease in animals and humans. Monitoring the expansion of tick populations is challenging and in large areas such as northern Sweden it can be beneficial to take advantage of citizen science. Therefore, people living in northern Sweden were asked to submit ticks collected from their pets or from themselves during the tick seasons of 2018 (north of river Dalälven; n = 1087) and 2019 (from the four northernmost Swedish provinces; n = 514). Ticks were identified at the species level and further analysed with a microfluidic technique to detect carried tick-borne pathogens. Forty-eight PCR assays targeting an array of tick-borne bacteria, viruses and protozoa were performed per sample in the assay.

resultsThe most frequently detected pathogens were Rickettsia helvetica (15.6% in 2018 and 3.5% in 2019) followed by Borrelia garinii (5.9% in 2018 and 11.5% in 2019) and Borrelia afzelii (5.7% in 2018 and 1.2% in 2019).

conclusionsThis study provides data on tick-borne pathogens harbored by feeding ticks collected from a rather poorly investigated geographical area using a One Health perspective. Microfluidic techniques are confirmed to be an effective tool to screen large amounts of samples and to also find pathogens occurring at lower rates. This approach best supports the design of updated risk-maps and to find areas that deserve targeted tick sampling to obtain a more accurate risk assessment and achieve effective disease prevention.

Indexed as

IxodidaeTick-Borne DiseasesAnimalsCitizen ScienceFemaleRickettsiaSwedenAnaplasma spp.Borrelia spp.Citizen scienceIxodes persulcatusIxodes ricinusRickettsia spp.Tick-borne pathogensTicks

Identifiers

PMID41709341
PMCPMC12931012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.