Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41709447›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

'It Was a Bit of a Now or Never Situation': Experiences of Preconception Care and Support for Women With Multiple Long-Term Health Conditions.

Stephanie J Hanley, Sharon McCann, Siang Ing Lee, Danielle Schoenaker, Megha Singh, Ngawai Moss, Nishshanka Mudiyanselage Chamendi Lakshrieni Nishshanka, Zoe Vowles, Rachel Plachcinski, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stephanie J HanleyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5260-4450
Sharon McCannHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Siang Ing LeeDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Danielle SchoenakerSchool of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7652-990X
Megha SinghDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3680-7124
Ngawai MossDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9369-5072
Nishshanka Mudiyanselage Chamendi Lakshrieni NishshankaDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Zoe VowlesGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rachel PlachcinskiDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarSchool of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Mairead BlackSchool of Medicine, Medical Science and Nutrition, Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Louise LocockHealth Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Beck TaylorWarwick Applied Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council and in collaboration with the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/W014432/1Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) NIHR302955NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne in five women enters pregnancy with multiple long-term health conditions, which is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and child outcomes. There is a lack of research exploring individuals' experiences of preconception care for these women, which is also reflected in existing guidelines that predominantly focus on single health conditions. This study aimed to explore experiences of preconception care and support among women with multiple long-term health conditions and health professionals.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of qualitative data collected by the MuM-PreDiCT consortium. The primary study involved semi-structured interviews between March 2022 and May 2023 with pregnant (> 28 weeks) and postnatal (< 2 years) women with multiple long-term physical and/or mental health conditions in the United Kingdom, and healthcare professionals involved in their care. Data captured within the preconception coding reports were analysed thematically.

resultsFifty-seven women and 51 healthcare professionals were interviewed. Six themes were identified from the thematic analysis. Women and professionals described the importance of tailored preconception care and support, incorporating condition-focused counselling (sub-theme 1) and medication planning (sub-theme 2). Sensitive and realistic care and support were considered essential, but women had mixed experiences of involvement and empathy from different professionals. The significance of optimising antenatal care by making every preconception contact count was emphasised by both women and professionals, who valued early referrals, specialist input and integration of services. Although professionals viewed the preconception period as an opportunity to empower women, many women felt they had to self-advocate and seek information due to gaps in professional awareness, knowledge and education. Professionals reported differing views on who, within the care team, should take responsibility for care delivery. Some believed that women should play an active role in managing their health, including initiating conversations around pregnancy intentions. The delivery of preconception care was complicated by a range of challenges, including a lack of service integration, availability, time and funding.

conclusionWomen with long-term health conditions can experience substantial gaps in preconception care, characterised by inconsistent guidance and limited access to tailored, reliable support, which frequently leads to feelings of isolation and the need to seek additional information when preparing for pregnancy. These results will inform the co-development of a care bundle for affected women. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Our Patient and Public Involvement group was involved in the design of the study and the analysis and interpretation of the data, and two public study investigators are part of the author group.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsPreconception CareAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdomintegrated health care systemsmultimorbiditymultiple long‐term conditionsobstetricspatient centred carepreconceptionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41709447
PMCPMC12916850

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.